Skip to content

(Classic) NAPA

(Classic) NAPA

Categories

6 results found

  1. It is noted that there is an item "Calculation Method for Stability" under MGR*STABILITY_BOOKLET, but it is too simple and only calculates GM.

    It is suggested to develop a function that Auto generates a "Manual Calculation Process" for all the intact stability criterion of CGR 2008IS-A2.2 and 2008IS-A2.3 , I have made a secondary development in MGR for this, hope it could be under DB7, please contact me in case you need.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. When working in parallel with both classic and Designer, it would be useful to have a refresh command like the refresh button in Designer. So when something (geometry for instance) is made/updated in Designer it is easy to see this in classic NAPA without re-entering the project on TASK level

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. For some specific ships equipped for crane operations, it's required to verify some intact stability criteria related to the maximum heeling angle of the ship and minimum freeboard margin when the crane operates at its maximum outreach and hook load. I see that some software houses have a tool/application that, for a fixed loading condition and having as input the crane pedestal position on deck, the cog of the extended crane and the hook load value/position, allows to verify those criteria for each slew angle of the crane (for instance, starting from 0°to 350° with 10° step each position), giving…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Based on the arrangement, connections and openings used in the PROB manager and a given setup, it would be really useful if NAPA can generate an automatic watertight plan with watertight bulkheads, decks, openings, etc. in order to avoid a hand-made work and relative mistakes.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Functionality should be linked to the update-button instead.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. It would be nice to get the intermediate results of the SGIS criteria calculations to check in more detail where the critical parts are.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?